By Author
  By Title
  By Keywords

April 1987, Volume 37, Issue 4

Case Reports


Omar Ali Khan  ( Surgical B Ward, Khyber Hospital, Peshawar. )


Four cases of Choledochal Cyst are presented. The preoperative diagnostic difficulty is re-em­phasized. The pathology and surgical management is discussed. Choledochal Cysts are uncommon but correct management ensures symptom free future for the patient. Recent report advocating cyst excision, if technically possible, is also reviewed (JPMA 37:105 1987).


Choledochal Cyst, an abnormal cystic dilatation of the biliary tree, was first reported by Vater1 in 1923. Douglas2 was the first to describe this anomaly accurately in 1852. The disease is rare and until 1926 only one case was encountered amongst 1938 Biliary operations performed at the Mayo Clinic3.
Recently, with improved diagnostic methods, choledochal cysts are recognized with increasing frequency preoperatively.
CASE I: On 1st January 1984, two years six months old female child with a history of recurrent abdominal pain and bilious vomiting was admitted to the hospital. She was also not thriving. On examination a mass in the right hypochondrium was present. Laparotomy showed a large cystic dilatation of the common bile duct. Choledocho­cyst-duodenostomy was performed. Her post operative recovery was uneventful and the patient has been symptom free over the last 2 years.
CASE 2: On 25th February 1984, a 2 years old boy was admitted in the hospital with right upper quadrant mass. Exploratory laparotomy showed a large cystic dilatation of the common bile duct. Choledocho-cyst-duodenostomy was performed. His post operative recovery was uneventful and the child has remained symptom free for almost 2 years (Figure 1).

CASE 3: On 30th January 1985 a thirty years old female was admitted to the hospital with recur­rent pain of nine years duration in the right hypochondrium. The pain had increased infre­quency over the last 3 months. There was no history of jaundice. On clinical examination there was no palpable mass: Murphy’s sign was positive. Oral cholecystogram showed non-func­tioning gall bladder. On laparotomy an inflamed gall bladder was found for which cholecystectomy was done. There was also associated cystic mass arising from the lateral wall of the common bile duct. Choledocho-cyst -duodenostomy was per­formed. Her post operative recovery was unevent­ful. She was discharged on the seventh day and has remained symptom free for over a year now. CASE 4: On 28th September 1985, a 15 years old female was admitted to the hospital with recur­rent pain in the right hypochondrium associated with vomiting off and on for the last 4 years. On examination there was a cystic mass in the right hypochondrium. Intravenous cholangiogram did not outline the gallbladder,nor the cystic mass.
Laparotomy showed a large cystic dilatation of the common bile duct for which choledocho cystduodenostomy was performed. Her post-operative recovery was uneventful and the patient has remained symptom free since.


The incidence of choledochal cyst is unknown. Large series quote an incidence of approximately I in 13000 births. Sixty percent recorded cases are from Japan4.
The high incidence of choledochal cyst in the Japanese is well known. The disease has\\ been reported in Japanese literature since 1905. By 1936,55 cases had been reported5. This high incidence of choledochal cyst found in the Japanese has not been observed in other Asian races6. The prevalence of this condition in this part of the world is not recorded. The clustering of these 4 cases in a course of 2 years could just be a chance occurrence since our hospital records show no previous cases.
A ratio of 74% females to 26% males7 has been reported. In the present series there are 3 females (75%) and one male (25%). It is pre­dominantly found in children and young people though no age is exempt: the oldest patient re­corded being a 78 years old woman8,fifty five percent of cases occur in the first 10 years of life and 35% between the ages of 10—40 years, the remaining 10% are over the age of 40 years6. Our report. of 2 cases (50%), less than 10 years of age and 2 cases (50%) 10-40 years age range is consistent with reported age distribution. Alonso­leg, Rener and Passango in l9599  postulated that the majority of choledochal cyst are congenital. This is supported by the associated high incidence anomalies of biliary tract with this condition10
Longmire, Mandiola and Gordon in 197111 described 4 types of choledochal cysts on clinico pathological basis (Figure 2).

1) Spherical dilatation of common bile duct comprise majority of cases. Our cases 1 ,2 and 4 belong to this group.
2) Congenital diverticulum arising from lateral wall of common bile duct. This variety is rare, only 14 cases are documented to date12. Our case No.3 belongs to this group.
3) Choledochocele: Dilatation of intraduo­denal portion of common bile duct: 9 cases have been reported  to date13
4) Multiple communicating cystic dilatation of intra and extra hepatic biliary tree was originally described by Mcwhorter14  attri­buted to Caroli, Soupault and Kossa­kiwski15 and designated as type IV chole­ dochal cyst by Longmire et al11. A total of 45 cases have been reported to date.
The typical Macroscopic and Microscopic features of choledochal cyst have been extensively reviewed5,7,16,17 The cyst may arise from any part of the duct, can increase to any size and the duct proximal to the cyst may be normal or mini­mally dilated. The gallbladder is not usually dilated.
The preoperative diagnosis of the cyst has proved to be an elusive goal in most cases due to rarity of the condition and the variability of clinical manifestations. The classical triad of vague intermittent upper abdominal pain, inter­mittent jaundice and right upper abdominal mass is rarely seen. None of our patients had these features together. Plain x-ray films of abdomen were not helpful. Barium studies were not done in any of the cases. Oral cholecystogram, which was done in case 3 was not helpful. Intravenous cholangiogram in the jaundiced patients may outline the cyst. It was done in case 4 but did not help in diagnosis. Liver function tests done ,in all cases were normal. Grey scale ultrasound a very effective diagnostic tool and recently being widely used, was not available to us. Operative cholan­giogram at exploratory laparotomy most often provides a definitive diagnosis. The complication of choledochal cyst such as cirrhosis, ascending cholangitis, perforation and carcinoma in the cyst wall are grave and stress the importance of early correct management. The risk of carcinoma developing in cyst wall is markedly higher than that in the general population. A total of 63 cases have been reported to date; an incidence of 47%1 8 The overall risk of biliary tract carcinoma varies from 0.007%-0.04% where as it appears to be 2% in association with chole­dochal cyst19 The treatment of choledochal cyst is by operation. Conservative treatment is attended by mortality reaching l00%20. The main controversy concerns the type of surgical management. Choledocho-cyst-duodenostomy has been the procedure adopted in all the 4 cases. This was first described by Bakes in 190721 and is still frequently employed. A side to side anasto­mosis is performed between the most dependent part of the choledochal cyst and the second part of the duodenum. A dependent drainage is easily established 22.The operation is technically very easy and is more physiological. It has beer, found a most satisfactory procedure and,m our cases, has not been attended by any complication so far. The frequent argument against this procedure is that it is associated with high incidence of ascen­ding cholangitis; this has not occuned in any of our 4 cases.


I am indebted to Prof. Feroz Shah and Qazi Khadim Mohyuddin for permission to study their cases, to Dr. Tasleem Akhtar, Director, PMRC, Peshawar for her constructive criticism and guidance in preparing this paper and to Miss Shahnaz Perveen and Miss Mubarak Begum for Secretarial assistance.


1. Vater, A. Dissertatioo Inaugualis Medica. Proes. Diss. qua Scirrhis Vicerum Disseret C.S. Ezerlus, 4 Wittembergaes Pamphlets, Vol. 881, p. 22. (Another copy H22, 70, 19. Edinburagh,University  Library, l723;p.l.
2. Douglas, A.H. Choledochal cyst. Med. Sd. (London), 1852; 14:97.
3. Judd, E.S. and Greene, E.I. Choledochus cyst. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1928; 46:3 17.
4. Jones, P.G., Smith, ED., Clake, A.M. and Kent, M.  Choledochal cysts; experience with radical excision.J. Pediatr. Surg., 1971;6:112.
5. Yotsuyanagi, S. Contributions to aetiology and pathogenicity of idiopathic cystic dilatation of  common bile duct with report of 3 cases; new aetiological theory based on supposed unequal epithelial proliferation at stage of physiological epithelial occlusion of primitive choledochus. Gann, 1936; 30:601.
6. Lee, S.S., Mm, P.C., Kim, G.S. and Hong, P.W. Choledochal cyst; a report of nine cases and review of the literature. Arch. Surg., 1969;99:19.
7. Tsardakas, E. and Robentt, A.H. Congenital cystic dilatation of the common bile duct; report of three  cases, analysis of 57 cases and review of the litera­ture. Arch. Surg., 1956; 72:311.
8. Madding, G.F. Congenital cystic dilatation of the common bile duct. Ann. Surg., 1961; 154:288.
9. Alonso-Lej, F., Rever, W.B. Jr. and Passango, DJ. Congenital choledochal cyst with a report of 2 and an analysis of 94 cases. Int. Abstr. Surg., 1959; 108:1.
10. Komi, N. Uclaka, H., Iheda, N. and Khsiwazi, Y. Congenital dilatation of biiary tract; new classi­fication and study with particular reference to anomalous arrangement of the pancreatiobiiary ducts. Jpn. J. Gastroenterology, 1977; 12:293.
11. Longmire, W.P. Jr., Mandiola, S.A. and Gordon, H.E. Congenital cystic disease of the liver and  biiarysystem. Ann. Surg., 1971; 174:711.
12. Murphy, B., Waldron, R., Drumm, J. and McCarthy, C.F. Choledochal cysts, report of 3 cases and review. Postgrad. Med. J., 1984; 60: 397.
13. Oldbourne, N.A. Choledochal cyst. A review of the cystic anomalies of the biliary tree. Ann. R. Coil.  Surg. England, 1975;56:26.
14. McWhorter, G.L. Congenital cystic dilatation of the common bile duct. Report of a case with cure. Arch. Surg., 1924; 8:604.
15. Caroli. J., Saupaulat, R., Kossakowski, J., Plaker, L. and Pahadowska, M.La dilatation polykstique congenitale des voires biliares intrahepatiques. Sem. Hop. Paris, 1958; 34:488.
16. Fonkaisrud, E.W. and Boles, E.T. Jr. Choledochal cysts in infancy and childhood. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet., 1965; 121:733.
17. Mahour, G.H. and Lynn, H.B. Choledochal cyst in children. Surgery, 1969; 65:967.
18. Todani, T., Tabuchi, K., Watanabe, Y. and Kobayashi, T. Carcinoma arising in the wall of congenital bile duct cysts. Cancer, 1979; 44: 1134.
19. Longmire, W.P. Jr., McArthur,M.S.,Bastounis, E.A. and Hiatt, J. Carcinomas of extrahepatic biiary tract.Ann. Surg., 1973;178:333.
20. Attar, S. and Obeid, S. Congenial cyst of the common bile duct; a review of the literature and a report of 2 cases. Ann. Surg., 1955; 142:289.
21. Bakes, J. ,Offizielles Protokoil der K.K. Gesellschaft der Arzte in Wien. Wissenschaftliche Litzung (contribution to discussion). Wien. Klin. Wochen­schr., 1907;20:298.
22. Ravitch, H.M. and Snyder, G.B. Congenital cystic dilatation of the common bile duct: special reference to radiographic studies. Surgery, 1958; 44:752.

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association has agreed to receive and publish manuscripts in accordance with the principles of the following committees: