Shaukat Ali Chhipa ( Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Sadia Masood ( Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Yasir Salarzai ( Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Qazi Assad Khan ( Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Khabir Ahmad ( Section of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Sara Sajid ( Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Objective: To describe the ocular manifestations of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrosis among inpatients at a tertiary care hospital.
Methods: The retrospective observational descriptive study was carried out at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data on age, gender, aetiology and ocular findings related to patients diagnosed with Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrosis between January 2000 and December 2011. SPSS 19 was used for statistical analysis.
Results: There were 87 patients; 48(55.2%) of them being males. The overall mean age was 33.2±22.2 years, ranging from 1 month to 84 years.
The most common aetiology was idiopathic 20(23%) followed by non-steroidal inflammatory drugs and anti-epileptics 11(12.6%) each. Besides, 84(96.6%) patients had oral mucosal involvement whereas 45(51.7%) had ocular and 27(31.0%) had genital-mucosal involvement. Glassroding was performed in 16(18.4%) patients due to minor conjunctival adhesions.
Conclusion: Ocular manifestations of varying severity were frequent, with drugs being the most common aetiology.
Keywords: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Toxic epidermal necrolysis, Ocular manifestations, Aetiology. (JPMA 65: 62; 2015).
Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS)was first described in 1922 by Stevens and Johnson, and is an immunological disorder characterised by acute blistering of the skin and involvement of at least any two mucous membranes from among oral, nasal, ocular, vaginal and urethral.1
Toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) is a severe form of SJS and involves more than 30% of body surface area.2 In general population, SJS and TEN have an annual incidence (new cases per million people) of 1.2 to 7.0 and 0.4 to 1.2, respectively; affecting all ages, genders, all ethnic groups and races.3,4
The pathogenesis of SJS remains unclear. Aetiological factors include infection, drugs as allopurinol, antibiotics, anticonvulsants and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], and malignancies. However, approximately half of the cases are idiopathic.5,6 The clinical course is typically prolonged even after drug discontinuation, which remains the mainstay of treatment.7
SJS causes visual loss as it can lead to corneal damage, including scarring and vascularisation. In more than half of the cases, ocular consequences are acute in nature, occurring with or after the involvement of skin.8
Ocular manifestations of SJS/TEN remain an understudied research area, especially in South Asian countries, including Pakistan. This is despite the evidence of a genetic predisposition to these conditions among South Asian population partly due to altered drug metabolism.
The current study was planned to enumerate the ocular manifestations of SJS/TEN among inpatients at a tertiary care hospital.
Patients and Methods
The retrospective observational descriptive study was carried out at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data on age, gender, aetiology and ocular findings related to patients diagnosed with SJS/TEN between January 2000 and December 2011. Patients having history of previous ocular problems were excluded from the study. A structured proforma was used to record data on demographics, type and severity of ocular complications, and aetiology of SJS or TEN. Detailed drug history was also noted to figure out the relative frequency of each aetiological agent.
Data was analysed using SPSS 19. Frequencies and percentages were calculated to describe categorical variables. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were computed for quantitative variables such as age. No statistical test of significance was used because of the descriptive nature of study.
A total of 87 patients with SJS/TEN were hospitalised during the study period and all were included. Among them, 48(55.2%) were males and 39(44.8%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 33.2±22.2 years and their median age was 36 years (range: 1 month to 84 years).
The most common aetiology was idiopathic 20(23%) followed by NSAIDs and anti-epileptics 11(12.6%) each, fluroquinolones 8(9.2%), anti-malarial drugs 7(8.0%), anti-gout medication 6(6.9%), penicillin and cephalosporins 5(5.7%) each (Table).
Besides, 84(96.6%) patients had oral mucosal involvement whereas 45(51.7%) had ocular and 27(31.0%) had genital-mucosal involvement. Glassroding was performed in 16(18.4%) patients due to minor conjunctival adhesions.
Even after use of lubricants, 2(2.2%) patients developed longstanding signs and symptoms of dryness and conjunctival adhesions, leading to an ulcer formation in 1(1.14%). The ulcer resolved leaving a non-central corneal scar.
The study aimed at reviewing the presenting features, especially ocular complications, of SJS/TEN in a tertiary care hospital. It found that nearly half the study population had ocular manifestations.9 Ocular complications may occur acutely and may even result in sight-threatening conditions such as corneal scars/vascularisation. Therefore, it is extremely important that these patients have regular eye assessment.10
It is important to mention that the management of ocular complications of SJS has not changed significantly over the past several decades. The management of acute eye manifestations usually starts with frequent lubrication of the eye surface. In our study, glassroding was performed in nearly 1 in 5 patients to treat conjunctival adhesions. Two patients developed long-term eye dryness and conjunctival adhesions which were treated with eye lubricants.
The differences in the severity of ocular complications at presentation are possible in different ethnic and racial groups because of differences in access to care and genetic differences in drug metabolism.11 Unfortunately, there is paucity of literature on such aspects of SJS/TEN, particularly in South East Asia. Eye involvement often is long-term and sometime sight-threatening.12 In acute phase, most patients consult a general physician or a dermatologist. Ophthalmologist is consulted only later on. Thus a multi-disciplinary team needs to be involved from the outset to improve both short- and long-term management. Patient education about possible risks is also important.
In the current study, the exact aetiology could not be identified in one-fourth of cases. Most of our cases were drug-related, the common agents being NSAIDs, anti-epileptics, fluroquinolones, anti-malarials, anti-gout medication, penicillin and cephalosporins. Various studies have shown that drugs are responsible for up to 60% of SJS cases.11,13
Ocular manifestations of varying severity are frequent in SJS/TEN and can lead to long-term complications. Timely management of eye manifestations is important to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Drugs were the most common cause in our patients. Further studies are vital for a better understanding and identification of the possible aetiological factors.
1. Stevens AM, Johnson FC. A new eruptive fever associated with stomatitis and ophthalmia: report of two cases in children. Arch Pediatr Adolescent Med 1922; 24: 526-33.
2. Roujeau JC. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severity variants of the same disease which differs from erythema multiforme. J Dermatol 1997; 24: 726-9.
3. Mittmann N, Knowles SR, Koo M, Shear NH, Rachlis A, Rourke SB. Incidence of toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in an HIV cohort: an observational, retrospective case series study. Am J Clin Dermatol 2012; 13: 49-54.
4. Chan HL, Stern RS, Arndt KA, Langlois J, Jick SS, Jick H, et al. The incidence of erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. A population-based study with particular reference to reactions caused by drugs among outpatients. Arch Dermat 1990; 126: 43-7.
5. Hazin R, Ibrahimi OA, Hazin MI, Kimyai-Asadi A. Stevens-Johnson syndrome: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Ann Med 2008; 40: 129-38.
6. Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Naldi L, Halevi S, Bouwes Bavinek JN, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128: 35-44.
7. Revuz J, Penso D, Roujeau JC, Guillaume JC, Payne CR, Wechsler J, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clinical findings and prognosis factors in 87 patients. Arch Dermatol 1987; 123: 1160-5.
8. Chang YS, Huang FC, Tseng SH, Hsu CK, Ho CL, Sheu HM. Erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis: acute ocular manifestations, causes, and management. Cornea 2007; 26: 123-9.
9. Leonard J, Dart J. The skin and the eyes. Rook\'s Textbook of Dermatology. 8th ed. USA: Blackwell publishing; 2004, p. 1-37.
10. Gueudry J, Roujeau JC, Binaghi M, Soubrane G, Muraine M. Risk factors for the development of ocular complications of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 157-62.
11. Power WJ, Ghoraishi M, Merayo-Lloves J, Neves RA, Foster CS. Analysis of the acute ophthalmic manifestations of the erythema multiforme/Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis disease spectrum. Ophthalmol 1995; 102: 1669-76.
12. Sotozono C, Ueta M, Kinoshita S. The management of severe ocular complications of stevens-johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Arch Dermatol 2009; 145: 1336-7; author reply 7-8.
13. Kompella VB, Sangwan VS, Bansal AK, Garg P, Aasuri MK, Rao GN. Ophthalmic complications and management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome at a tertiary eye care centre in south India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002; 50: 283-6.