Maqbool Qadir ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Farah Naz Qamar ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Shahzadi Resham ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Syed Rehan Ali ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Ahmad Khalil ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Shakeel Ahmed ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Hasina Amin ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Sunaina Mossani ( Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. )
Objectives: To report reduction in transmission of multidrug resistant organisms from the neonatal intensive care unit after the implementation of simple risk-reduction strategies.
Methods: Using a pre-and-post design, the study was carried out from June 2010 to December 2011 at the neonatal intensive care unit of Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, which is 12-bed, level III facility. The intervention comprised hand washing certification for all staff, use of chlorhexidine instead of povodine iodine for skin preparation, use of non-sterile gloves for diaper change, implementation of barrier nursing for clinically-suspected and culture-proven infections, provision of separate intubation and central line trolley for each room and limiting the use of umbilical catheters to 7 days. Data is reported for 3-month pre-intervention period, one-month implementation phase, and for 3-month post-intervention phase. Data for 12 months post-implementation is reported to show sustainability.
Results: The average pre intervention rates of bloodstream infections due to extended spectrum b lactamase, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus were 4.7, 3.3, 1.2 and zero respectively. The average number of admissions during the 3 phases was almost similar (49, 46 and 53 respectively). There was sustained reduction in rates for all organisms 12 months after the intervention period.
Conclusion: Nosocomial transmission of multi drug resistant organisms within the neonatal intensive care unit can be effectively reduced by adopting simple strategies.
Keywords: NICU, Multidrug resistant organisms, BSI, Pakistan. (JPMA 65: 72; 2015)
Nosocomial infection is defined by the US Department of Health and Human Services for Disease Control and Prevention as an infection during hospitalisation that was not present or incubating at the time of admission.1 Nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The number of neonates who develop nosocomial infection varies from 6.2% to 33%.2,3 Patients who develop nosocomial infections have longer stays in hospitals and have higher mortality.4 According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), 1 million deaths per year are due to neonatal bloodstream infections (BSI) and 42% of these occur in the first week of life.5 The incidence of neonatal BSI is approximately 1-10/1000 live-births in developed countries, but in Pakistan it is three times more common.6 It has been indicated that reported rates of neonatal infections were 3-20 times higher than those reported for hospital-born babies in industrialised countries. Klebsiella pneumoniae, other gram-negative rods (Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp, Acinetobacter spp), and Staphylococcus aureus were the major pathogens among 11471 bloodstream isolates reported. Several interventions have been tried and tested in different countries in an effort to reduce nosocomial infections in neonates.7 One study identified and implemented the best practices for reducing infections in NICU and demonstrated a reduction in the rate of acquired infection from 7.4 to 4.0 per 1000 patient days.8 Another study reported a decrease of up to 29% after comprehensive infection control measures.9 The application of 4% chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord was effective in reducing the risk of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in rural Pakistan.10 As is obvious, simple strategies can lead to decrease in healthcare-associated infections in hospitalised neonates. We adopted six strategies to reduce the rate of nosocomial BSIs due to multi drug resistant organisms (MDRO) in the NICU and report the effect of these interventions in the reduction of such infections.
Material and Methods
Using a pre-and-post design, the study was carried out from June 2010 to December 2011 at the neonatal intensive care unit of Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, which is 12-bed, level III facility, which admits in-born and out-born infants up to 28 days. There are 4 rooms out of which two have 5 incubators at a distance of approximately one-and-a-half meter from each other. The other two rooms are isolation units. The distance between patient and washing basin is one meter. The patient-to-nurse ratio is 1:2 in the rooms and 1:1 in the isolation units.
Surveillance for infections in intensive care areas was performed routinely. Data on BSI due to MDROS, patient days and device days were recorded routinely by designated infection control staff. The definitions used were standardised according to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System.8 Monitoring for hand hygiene compliance was done as part of monthly audit and data recorded by infection control staff.
Data was reported for 3 months pre-intervention period, one-month implementation phase, and for 3 months post-intervention. Pre-intervention data was collected and all strategies were planned after reviewing literature and were shared with the infection control team and NICU staff.
Data was collected from monthly reports of surveillance of the infection control department of the hospital to control for bias. Within unit, transmission of MDR acinetobacter, pseudomonas, vancomycin resistant enterococcus (VRE), extended spectrum b lactamase producer (ESBL) and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were used as markers for nosocomial BSI. The number of admissions within the entire unit was used as the denominator. We calculated the 3 months\' average and divided it by the number of admissions in that period. Data for 12 months post implementation were maintained to show sustainability.
We adopted six strategies identified from previously reported studies, and implemented it within our NICU (Figure-1).
Hand washing certification was implemented in Sept 2010 for all NICU staff including physicians, nurses and paramedics. It comprised a 3-minute video on hand washing technique, followed by demonstration by the participating healthcare worker. Upon successful demonstration of the 7 steps of hand washing, the participants were certified with re-certification after 6 months.
Povodine Iodine solutions were previously used for all procedures (cannulations and catheterisations etc.) within the NICU. Based on recent evidence,11 we implemented the use of 2% chlorhexidine instead of povidine for antisepsis.
Strict barrier nursing and gown and glove precautions were reinforced for suspected or culture-proven septic patient. All physicians and staff entering the isolation area had to wear a sterile gown. This was not being practised strictly earlier.
We introduced a separate resuscitation and central line trolley for each of the 4 rooms of the NICU, containing sterilised endotracheal tubes, stylets, laryngoscopes, sterile gloves and central lines. Earlier, a single trolley was in place for use in all rooms of the NICU.
Daily goal sheets were introduced in order to keep a record of the daily changes made in the management, ordering investigations, and particularly to review the need of umbilical and other central lines. Efforts were made to limit the utilisation days of central and umbilical lines. Umbilical lines were removed on 7th day unless deemed necessary by the consultant neo-natologist.
Finally, practice of non-sterile gloving was implemented for changing diapers. Although no recommendation for this was found in international literature, we assumed that this might be useful in decreasing the colonisation rates of enteric gram-negative infections.
Data was entered into Excel 2010. The rates of BSI are reported as per 1000 patient days, which is calculated by dividing the number BSIs by the number of patient days and multiplying the result by 1000.
The rates of infection by each pathogen in the pre- and post-intervention periods were compared using paired t-test, and p<0.05 was taken as significant.
The average pre-intervention rates of BSI due to ESBL, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas and MRSA were 4.7, 3.3, 1.2 and 0 per 1000 patient days respectively. In the implementation phase, the BSI rates for all organisms dropped except for ESBL. A reduction in rates was observed in the post-implementation period (ESBL 2.73 per 1000 patient days, Acinetobacter 1.3, and 0 for Pseudomonas and MRSA). The reduction in rates were not statistically significant (ESBL: p=0.6; Acinetobacter: p=0.2; and Pseudomonas: p=0.4). No case of BSI due to VRE was reported during the entire study period. The average number of admissions per month during the 3 phases was almost similar (49, 46 and 53 respectively). There was sustained reduction in rates for all organisms 12 months after the post-intervention period (Table-1).
Hand-washing compliance during the study was also closely observed (Figure-2).
Neonates are a special population who are at risk of acquiring infections because of their immature immune system compounded by admission in NICU. Limited evidence of infection prevention measures from developing countries indicate that infection control measures are possible and are effective in reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).12 Implementation of infection control measures is complex and requires finances, communication and documentation at multiple levels. However, there is evidence of decrease in rate of infections with the use of control measures that did not require use of technology.13 Our study also demonstrates that with the implementation of simple, practical measures the rates of BSIs in the NICU could be reduced. MDROs are a marker of infections acquired nosocomially. Reduction in rates of BSI due to MDRO is a surrogate marker of reduction in HAIs.14 Limiting the rates of MDROs within hospitals is important due to limited therapeutic options for these organisms. Improvement in hand hygiene has been reported to be the single most effective measure for infection control in hospitals.15 We demonstrated an increase in hand hygiene compliance by using a simple, educational strategy. Contact isolation and limiting the use of central lines has been shown to reduce the risk of acquiring and transmitting infections in healthcare settings.16 Limiting the use of central lines did not require additional finances and was implemented easily.17 Regarding contact isolation, the non-sterile gloves and gowns were available in limited numbers within the unit and with a little increase in resources we were able to implement it in all rooms of the NICU. Although health economics was not the objective of this study, but reduction in nosocomial infections is well known to reduce morbidity, mortality and cost of treatment and any measure that can reduce HAIs can be assumed to be beneficial financially.18 Routine use of contact isolation outside an outbreak setting has recently been shown to be extremely effective in reducing the rates of ESBL gram-negative organisms.19 There is little evidence of the protective effect of wearing gloves during diaper change. However, it is documented that use of gloves during diaper-change significantly decreased bacterial hand contamination.20 As enteric gram-negative infections are a major cause of sepsis in the developing countries,21 we hypothesised that gloves for diaper change may reduce the rate of MDR gram-negative infections within the NICU. We did not perform any surveillance cultures to document the benefit of this measure neither can we comment on the benefit of the individual measure, but together with the other measures there was an overall reduction in BSIs. Transmission and persistence of resistant strains depends upon the availability of vulnerable patients and the impact of implementation and adherence to prevention efforts.
The data for a 17-month period is reported (3-month pre-intervention period, one-month implementation phase and 3-month post-intervention period followed by 12 months of sustainability) to avoid bias associated with seasonal trends of nosocomial infections.
Nosocomial transmission of MDRO within the NICU can be effectively reduced by adopting simple strategies.
We are grateful to the Infection Control Team for collecting and providing surveillance data on a regular basis, and all NICU staff members under the leadership of Anila Bardai (RN) and Simon Demas (RN) who helped in complying with the infection control strategies for infection control in the unit. Thanks are also due to the National Institute of Health\'s Fogarty International Centre for providing research training support though they had no role in study design, data analysis or report writing.
1. Lopez Sastre JB, Coto Cotallo D, Fernandez Colomer B. Neonatal sepsis of nosocomial origin: an epidemiological study from the" Grupo de Hospitales Castrillo". J Perinatal Med 2002; 30: 149-57.
2. Ferguson JK, Gill A. Risk stratified nosocomial infection surveillance in a neonatal intensive care unit: report on 24 months of surveillance. J Paediatr Child Health 1996; 32: 525-31.
3. Hentschel J, De Veer I, Gastmeier P, Riden H, Obladen M. Neonatal nosocomial infection surveillance: incidences by site and a cluster of necrotizing enterocolitis. Infection 1999; 27: 234-8.
4. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 285-91.
5. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J, Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005; 365:891.
6. Mahmood A, Rehman BR, Chughtai F. A survey of infection control practices in the delivery room and nursery to investigate and control the high rate of neonatal sepsis: An experience at a secondary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc 2008; 58: 237-40
7. O\'Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheterâ€"Related Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 35: 1281-307.
8. Cardo D, Horan T, Andrus M, Dembinski M, Edwards J, Peavy G, et al. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control 2004; 32: 470-85.
9. Bloom BT, Craddock A, Delmore PM, Kurlinski JP, Voelker M, Landfish N, et al. Reducing acquired infections in the NICU: observing and implementing meaningful differences in process between high and low acquired infection rate centers. J Perinatol 2003; 23: 489-92.
10. Soofi S, Cousens S, Imdad A, Bhutto N, Ali N, Bhutta ZA. Topical application of chlorhexidine to neonatal umbilical cords for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in a rural district of Pakistan: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1029-36
11. Darouiche RO, Wall Jr MJ, Itani KMF, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, et al. Chlorhexidine alcohol versus povidone iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 18-26.
12. Apisarnthanarak A, Fraser VJ. Feasibility and efficacy of infection-control interventions to reduce the number of nosocomial infections and drug-resistant microorganisms in developing countries: what else do we need? Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: 22-4.
13. Schelonka RL, Scruggs S, Nichols K, Dimmitt RA, Carlo WA. Sustained reductions in neonatal nosocomial infection rates following a comprehensive infection control intervention. J Perinatol 2006; 26: 176-9.
14. Zaidi AK, Huskins WC, Thaver D, Bhutta ZA, Abbas Z, Goldmann DA. Hospital acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet 2005; 365: 1175-88.
15. Gill CJ, Mantaring JB, Macleod WB, Mendoza M, Mendoza S, Huskins WC, et al. Impact of enhanced infection control at 2 neonatal intensive care units in the Philippines. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: 13-21.
16. D\'Agata EM, Horn MA, Ruan S, Webb GF, Wares JR. Efficacy of infection control interventions in reducing the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital setting. PLoS One 2012; 7: e30170.
17. Graham PL 3rd. Simple strategies to reduce healthcare associated infections in the neonatal intensive care unit: line, tube, and hand hygiene. Clin Perinatol 2010; 37: 645-53.
18. Payne NR, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, Horbar JD, Rogowski J. Marginal increase in cost and excess length of stay associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections in surviving very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 348-55.
19. Kola A, Holst M, Chaberny IF, Ziesing S, Suerbaum S, Gastmeier P. Surveillance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria and routine use of contact isolation: experience from a three-year period. J Hosp Infect 2007; 66: 46-51.
20. Pessoa-Silva CL, Dharan S, Hugonnet S, Touveneau S, Posfay-Barbe K, Pfister R, et al. Dynamics of bacterial hand contamination during routine neonatal care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004; 25: 192-7.
21. Cipolla D, Giuffre M, Mammina C, Corsello G. Prevention of nosocomial infections and surveillance of emerging resistances in NICU. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24 Suppl 1: 23-6.